<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Parents Speak Up and Out</title>
	<atom:link href="http://taoofchange.com/2008/10/27/parents-speak-up-and-out/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://taoofchange.com/2008/10/27/parents-speak-up-and-out/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 23:42:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeannie Newell</title>
		<link>http://taoofchange.com/2008/10/27/parents-speak-up-and-out/#comment-1456</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeannie Newell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 05:54:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taoofchange.com/?p=511#comment-1456</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this!  Also - advice from Ted Turner -  couples should replace themselves (2 child maximum) in consideration of the increasing world population.  If they want to, that is!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this!  Also &#8211; advice from Ted Turner &#8211;  couples should replace themselves (2 child maximum) in consideration of the increasing world population.  If they want to, that is!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tao</title>
		<link>http://taoofchange.com/2008/10/27/parents-speak-up-and-out/#comment-1439</link>
		<dc:creator>tao</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 16:57:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taoofchange.com/?p=511#comment-1439</guid>
		<description>PERFECTLY SAID Sami~~~ that covers everything and hits it right on. Thanks for your comment. It helps everything to be able to look at balance, perspective and different paths honored. I also hope we stop digging at folks who have no children yet are leading fulfilling, giving and productive lives.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PERFECTLY SAID Sami~~~ that covers everything and hits it right on. Thanks for your comment. It helps everything to be able to look at balance, perspective and different paths honored. I also hope we stop digging at folks who have no children yet are leading fulfilling, giving and productive lives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sami Grover</title>
		<link>http://taoofchange.com/2008/10/27/parents-speak-up-and-out/#comment-1438</link>
		<dc:creator>Sami Grover</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 13:44:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taoofchange.com/?p=511#comment-1438</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this TAO,

I am always glad to see folks willing to speak up and express these uncomfortable truths - that parenting isn&#039;t an obligation; that childlessness can be a positive choice for self and for society; and that having children is hard frickin work. I&#039;m sick to death of folks pushing the idea that parenting is the obvious conclusion for folks, and that folks who take a different route are somehow not complete, or not grown up enough. 

If you&#039;ll permit me to go off on a related tangent though - I do get tired of the zero population growth advocates too - the folks who say the only responsible choice is to not have kids. While TECHNICALLY they are right - we&#039;d all be better off if every conscious wannabe parent adopted - I just see no realistic way of reaching that society, and I see it branding us greenies as fanatics. 

A much more realistic, and productive, scenario is one that I believe this post is in allignment with - we need to create a society that CELEBRATES adoption, CELEBRATES conscious childlessness, CELEBRATES limiting the number of children you have - and we need to create a society that STOPS demonising/patronizing/ignoring the childless, STOPS demaning/underfunding/underewarding adopters/foster parents, STOPS glorifying giant families and the WONDEr of parenthood at all costs, but also STOPS digging at the folks who have a small number of children and do it well. 

Balance in all things - great to see it being discussed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this TAO,</p>
<p>I am always glad to see folks willing to speak up and express these uncomfortable truths &#8211; that parenting isn&#8217;t an obligation; that childlessness can be a positive choice for self and for society; and that having children is hard frickin work. I&#8217;m sick to death of folks pushing the idea that parenting is the obvious conclusion for folks, and that folks who take a different route are somehow not complete, or not grown up enough. </p>
<p>If you&#8217;ll permit me to go off on a related tangent though &#8211; I do get tired of the zero population growth advocates too &#8211; the folks who say the only responsible choice is to not have kids. While TECHNICALLY they are right &#8211; we&#8217;d all be better off if every conscious wannabe parent adopted &#8211; I just see no realistic way of reaching that society, and I see it branding us greenies as fanatics. </p>
<p>A much more realistic, and productive, scenario is one that I believe this post is in allignment with &#8211; we need to create a society that CELEBRATES adoption, CELEBRATES conscious childlessness, CELEBRATES limiting the number of children you have &#8211; and we need to create a society that STOPS demonising/patronizing/ignoring the childless, STOPS demaning/underfunding/underewarding adopters/foster parents, STOPS glorifying giant families and the WONDEr of parenthood at all costs, but also STOPS digging at the folks who have a small number of children and do it well. </p>
<p>Balance in all things &#8211; great to see it being discussed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

