<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Eco-pets</title>
	<atom:link href="http://taoofchange.com/2007/05/08/eco-pets/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://taoofchange.com/2007/05/08/eco-pets/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 23:42:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: tao</title>
		<link>http://taoofchange.com/2007/05/08/eco-pets/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>tao</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 23:34:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taoofchange.com/2007/05/08/eco-pets/#comment-9</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your response, Adam - I&#039;m looking forward to visiting you at thewildgreenyonder.com! 
Eco-responsibility in regard to all land use is indeed another reason I advocate adopting from shelters and rescues rather than perpetuate the &quot;business&quot; of breeders. In fact, I think there should be limits on breeding until animal populations are under control. Even then, owning a pet should be treated as a privilege, not a right - a way to control population and keep pets out of the hands of neglectful owners.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your response, Adam &#8211; I&#8217;m looking forward to visiting you at thewildgreenyonder.com!<br />
Eco-responsibility in regard to all land use is indeed another reason I advocate adopting from shelters and rescues rather than perpetuate the &#8220;business&#8221; of breeders. In fact, I think there should be limits on breeding until animal populations are under control. Even then, owning a pet should be treated as a privilege, not a right &#8211; a way to control population and keep pets out of the hands of neglectful owners.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Brock</title>
		<link>http://taoofchange.com/2007/05/08/eco-pets/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Brock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 06:03:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taoofchange.com/2007/05/08/eco-pets/#comment-8</guid>
		<description>From an animal rights perspective, I&#039;m all about your advice. Adopting animals from shelters is a noble act indeed, and fulfilling for both pet and owner. At the same time, I wonder if it&#039;s really so eco-friendly to own a dog. Many permaculturists despise dogs, because their activity degrades the soil and takes up valuable land area. Granted, this perspective discounts all the intangible benefits we get from having a pet - affection, a connection with other species, the empowerment of being responsible for another being. But I think the &quot;dogs from shelters = good for the planet&quot; concept is at least worth a second look.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From an animal rights perspective, I&#8217;m all about your advice. Adopting animals from shelters is a noble act indeed, and fulfilling for both pet and owner. At the same time, I wonder if it&#8217;s really so eco-friendly to own a dog. Many permaculturists despise dogs, because their activity degrades the soil and takes up valuable land area. Granted, this perspective discounts all the intangible benefits we get from having a pet &#8211; affection, a connection with other species, the empowerment of being responsible for another being. But I think the &#8220;dogs from shelters = good for the planet&#8221; concept is at least worth a second look.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

